Literary Twitter is pan phim khiêu dam & hentaiall in a tizzy, and we couldn't be more delighted, because the burns are piping hot, and the subject of the controversy is novelist extraordinaire Jane Austen.
SEE ALSO: Here are the winners of the 2017 National Book AwardsOn Friday, the Washington Postran an essay about the fact that Jane Austen never married, despite the fact that marriage and courtship were her main subjects in books like Pride and Prejudiceand Emma. But the ~scandal~ really got going after the Post tweeted out the piece on Sunday.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Based on a cache of journals and letters, the author represents Austen as a woebegone "spinster" who somehow managed to write classics about love despite lacking experience in marriage herself. But as Twitter users pointed out, a writer does not need first-hand knowledge of a subject to write about it masterfully.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Fantasy and science fiction writers really took the objection to the next level, by applying the article's observation -- that Austen did not write about what she experienced -- to their own slightly more out-of-this-world work.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Others pointed out that, given Austen's life and work, she might not have felt *quite* the despair at being unmarried that the Post'sauthor suggests.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
And then there were the straight-up literary burns.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Woe to the person who dares f*ck with Jane Austen fans on Twitter.
'Microsoft the Musical' is the catchiest tech musical you'll ever seeWikipedia knocked offline in Europe after 'malicious attack'Elon Musk says to look for the Tesla pickup truck reveal in NovemberLatest Apple rumor takes the 11 out of the 'iPhone Pro'Apple now lets you extend your iPhone warranty forever12 new fall TV shows everyone needs to watchApple's 'slofie' is its most pointless 'innovation' since AnimojiApple's 'slofie' is its most pointless 'innovation' since AnimojiApple finally confirms Apple TV+ release date and priceCelebrate the end of summer with 'Snowpiercer' Chelsea vs. Fulham 2024 livestream: Watch Premier League for free Bluesky adds trending topics NYT mini crossword answers for December 27 What 'The Sims 4' Lovestruck expansion pack gets wrong about polyamory No more TikTok FYP? California social media bill could totally reshape kids' online world Broncos vs. Bengals 2024 livestream: How to watch NFL online Syracuse vs. Washington State football livestreams: kickoff time, streaming deals, and more Best free online courses from MIT in September 2024 NYT Connections hints and answers for December 28: Tips to solve 'Connections' #566. Nottingham Forest vs. Spurs 2024 livestream: Watch Premier League for free
0.2269s , 8093.3515625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【pan phim khiêu dam & hentai】Twitter burns Washington Post for criticism of Jane Austen's love life,Global Hot Topic Analysis