国产精品美女一区二区三区-国产精品美女自在线观看免费-国产精品秘麻豆果-国产精品秘麻豆免费版-国产精品秘麻豆免费版下载-国产精品秘入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【eroticism】Google's firing of James Damore was legally fine, federal agency rules

Source:Global Hot Topic Analysis Editor:hotspot Time:2025-07-03 03:49:40

A federal agency has found that Google was well within its legal rights to fire James Damore in 2017.

The eroticismcompany dismissed its former engineer after he wrote a paper arguing that woman aren't as biologically equipped for leadership roles as men. Damore filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board after his firing, but a newly released January memo from the agency sides with Google.

SEE ALSO: We need to change the way we talk about women in tech

As NLRB legal counsel Jayme L. Sophir wrote on Jan. 16: "While much of [Damore's] memorandum was likely protected, the statements regarding biological differences between the sexes were so harmful, discriminatory, and disruptive as to be unprotected."

In the 10-page memo that first surfaced publicly in August 2017, Damore took issue with what he saw as a left-leaning "monoculture" at Google that left little room for public consideration of conservative viewpoints. That's where Sophir's reference to much of the memo being "protected" is relevant.

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

In Google's view, Damore crossed a line when he focused his writing on the biological differences between men and women. The NLRB letter acknowledges that he made an effort to "cloak" his more controversial points behind "'scientific' references and analysis" and "'not all women' disclaimers," but further notes that such hedging offers him no protection.

32_CA_205351_01_16_18_.pdf by mashablescribd on Scribd

Damore's "statements about immutable traits linked to sex—such as women’s heightened neuroticism and men’s prevalence at the top of the IQ distribution—were discriminatory and constituted sexual harassment," the letter reads.

The complaint might have gone differently if Google had been careless with the firing. But as Sophir's memo notes, Damore's boss and the human resources manager "prepared written talking points in advance" making it abundantly clear that his dismissal -- according to documentation Google provided -- was "based solely on the part of your post that generalizes and advances stereotypes about women versus men."

The NLRB letter also references a company-wide email sent out in the aftermath of Damore's dismissal that largely echoes the reasoning used to justify his firing. The agency ultimately recommended that the complaint be dismissed -- which it might have been, had it not been withdrawn in January.

We learned only recently that Damore is part of a class-action lawsuit alleging discrimination against white male conservatives in Google's hiring practices.


Featured Video For You
The hidden cost of a conveniently connected world

0.1647s , 10026.6328125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【eroticism】Google's firing of James Damore was legally fine, federal agency rules,Global Hot Topic Analysis  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产91精品花蝴蝶在线观看 | 国产av剧情超级爽闺蜜 | 99久久婷婷丁香五月综合缴缴情 | 91福利在线精品国产 | 91原创在线 | 午夜久久久精品一区二区三区 | 91福利网站| 午夜福利精品短视频在线 | av资源每日更新网站在线 | 91在线播放免费不卡无毒 | 91久久国产露脸精品国产 | 99爱视频精品免视看 | 国产91中文字幕 | 91国内精品野花午夜精品 | 午夜国产私人黄色爽片 | 福利午夜在线 | 99久久亚洲综合精品成 | 午夜国产精品视频在线 | 91人妻人人澡人人爽人人精品乱 | 91亚洲超碰无码中文字幕 | 91香蕉亚洲精品 | 午夜精品久久久久久久 | 99久久九九国产精 | 成人免费在线视频网站 | 99精品伊人久久久大香线蕉 | av五月天男人天堂 | 波多野结衣高清无码视频 | 国产97在线免费视频 | 91视频在线观看 | 91精品国产国语在线不卡 | 福利姬视频在线免费观看 | 午夜视频www| 丰满岳乱妇三级高清电影 | 99国产精品国产精品 | 91福利在线精品国产 | 午夜三级a三级三点 | 国产av无码亚洲avh一区二区 | 一区二区精品视频 | 国产97碰久久免费视频 | 97超精品视频在线观看 | 91精品国产成人网在线观看 |