国产精品美女一区二区三区-国产精品美女自在线观看免费-国产精品秘麻豆果-国产精品秘麻豆免费版-国产精品秘麻豆免费版下载-国产精品秘入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【??? ? ??】ACLU warns that 'no replies' on Twitter could violate the constitution

Source：Global Hot Topic Analysis Editor：hotspot Time：2025-07-03 04:29:19

Trump was basically Obama's reply guy throughout the 2010s,??? ? ?? so it's only fitting that he won't be able to take advantage of a new Twitter feature intended to curb his own comment trolls...legally, at least.

Twitter is testing an ability that lets users limit who can reply to their tweets. If you're part of the test, you'll be able to determine whether everyone can reply (the norm and current default), if only people that you follow can reply, or if only people you tag in a tweet can reply. If you don't tag anyone and go with that last option, you're basically turning off all replies, period.

Reactions to the new feature have been mixed. Some people are praising it as a way to stop potential harassers from replying. Others are joking about the feature's elitism. And of course, still more have turned the "no replies" tweet into a meme already.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

One important take points out the constitutional and legal ramifications of the feature for public officials. The ACLU has issued a statement that public officials need to be careful about how they use the reply-limiting features, lest they violate the First Amendment.

As a general matter, Twitter’s investment in user controls is a good thing. But public officials would be violating the First Amendment if they were to use this tool to block speakers on any accounts they’ve opened up for public conversation in their roles as government actors. Nor should public officials use this tool to decide who can, or can't, reply to accounts they have opened up for requests for government assistance, which may be on the rise due to COVID-19.

For the past several years, courts have been grappling with whether a public figure blocking someone on Twitter constitutes a violation of their first amendment rights. Most notably, the Court of Appeals upheld a ruling in a lawsuit brought against President Trump, saying that he was not allowed to block people after they had offended or disagreed with him, because it impinged on their freedom to engage in political speech.

The ACLU apparently sees the "no replies" feature as an extension of the idea of blocking because it limits speech in what has effectively become a digital public square. So, the new test features might be valuable, but people in the public eye are going to have to be careful about how they use them.

Topics Social Media X/Twitter Politics

0.1782s , 9827.6875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【??? ? ??】ACLU warns that 'no replies' on Twitter could violate the constitution,Global Hot Topic Analysis  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板： av人片一区二 | 国产1卡二卡3 | 午夜人妻熟女一区二区 | 国产av激情无码久久 | av福利片在线观看 | 99久久国产综合精品女不卡 | 91无人区乱码一二三四的原因是什么 | 午夜影院黄色 | 99热99re8国产在线播放 | 91亚色视频 | 波多野结伦理美女中文 | 91麻豆精品欧美视频 | 91精品无码久久久久久久久 | 91精品日韩人妻无码久久不卡 | 丁香花在线影院观看在线播放 | 99精品国产综合久久久久五月天 | 国产草莓视频在线观看 | 91麻豆精品人妻无码系列 | 91国语精品自产拍在线观看 | 1区2区3区4区精品免费视频 | 国产va无码人在线观看天堂 | 波多野42部无码喷潮在线 | 91视频网址入口 | 91成人网是什么 | av男人的天堂在线观看第三区 | 午夜色播在线观看 | 国产爆乳无码视频在线观看 | 高清欧美三级国产 | av无码a在 | av成人一区| 91精品国产网曝事件门 | 午夜精品不 | 91网站免费看nba亚洲免费 | 午夜成年奭片免费观看 | 一区二区三区免费视频 | 午夜老司机免费在线观 | 丰满少妇被猛烈进 | 丰满人妻中伦妇伦精品久久 | 99久久免费精品丝袜视频 | 99精品国产色综合久久不卡 | 97无码视频在线看视频 |