国产精品美女一区二区三区-国产精品美女自在线观看免费-国产精品秘麻豆果-国产精品秘麻豆免费版-国产精品秘麻豆免费版下载-国产精品秘入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【indian cute quick sex videos】DoorDash accused of charging iPhone users more than Android users in lawsuit

Source:Global Hot Topic Analysis Editor:fashion Time:2025-07-02 10:38:01

A class-action lawsuit against DoorDashis accusing the food delivery service of charging iPhone users more than customers who order via Android. It seems you could indian cute quick sex videosbe paying for that blue message bubblein ways you didn't even realise.

Filed in the U.S. District Court of Maryland, the case alleges that DoorDash engages in "deceptive, misleading, and fraudulent practices" by hiding unfair fees behind certain labels.

Specifically, some DoorDash orders include an "expanded range" fee, ostensibly applied when a restaurant is outside the customer's "normal delivery area." The lawsuit claims DoorDash charges this expanded range fee in a variety of situations where it is uncalled for. This includes sending orders to restaurant locations further away from the customer in order to "justify" charging the expanded range fee, as well as charging the fee to paid DashPass Program users to subsidise revenue lost under the subscription plan.


You May Also Like

Significantly, the class-action lawsuit also accuses DoorDash of charging the expanded range fee to iPhone users but not Android users, even when they make the same order, at the same time, to be delivered to the same location.

"[A]s tests indicate, DoorDash charges the expanded range fee on iPhone users more often than Android users and charges iPhone users more for 'delivering' (likely because studies reveal iPhone users earn more),'" the lawsuit states. "These tactics are simply money grabs."

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

The lawsuit also alleges that the app misleads customers into believing "normal delivery areas" are determined by geography, when in fact they are drawn according to how much a restaurant pays DoorDash.

SEE ALSO: Grubhub, DoorDash hit with lawsuit for 'deceptive and unfair' practices in Chicago

The suit contains a slew of other allegations as well, including claims that DoorDash's "city" fees mislead customers into believing the money is actually paid to the local government. The suit further claims that though DoorDash charges an optional "Express" fee of $3, the delivery service actually has no ability to hasten your order. This would mean paying DoorDash for expedited delivery may not get you fed any faster than if you just spent that $3 on a few extra sauce packets.

DoorDash denied the allegations in a statement to Mashable, and claimed that any discrepancy between pricing on different devices could potentially be due to gradual rollouts of new features.

"The claims put forward in the amended complaint are baseless and simply without merit," said a DoorDash spokesperson. "Our priority is to provide the best service possible and ensure there is clarity for consumers that allows them to make informed decisions. We ensure fees are disclosed throughout the customer experience, including on each restaurant storepage and before checkout. Building this trust is essential, and it’s why the majority of delivery orders on our platform are placed by return customers. We will continue to strive to make our platform work even better for customers, and will vigorously fight these allegations."


Related Stories
  • DoorDash data breach leaves important customer details exposed
  • DoorDash glitch results in hundreds of free food orders
  • Massive DoorDash hack exposes millions of customers' personal data
  • DoorDash will finally fix its controversial tipping structure
  • This is why DoorDash delivery workers usually prefer cash tips

This isn't the first time DoorDash's fee structure has come under judicial scrutiny. The company was previously the subject of a 2021 Chicago lawsuit, which alleged it used "bait-and-switch" tactics by initially displaying small delivery fees, then piling on additional costs at the end of an order. The suit also claimed DoorDash customers were misled about where their money was going, as "the customer 'tip' was used to subsidize DoorDash's own payment to its drivers," and the $1.50 "Chicago fee" went into DoorDash's pocket rather than to the city.

DoorDash further paid $2.5 million in 2020 to settle a D.C. lawsuitaccusing it of misleading customers as to where their tips actually went.

UPDATE: May. 23, 2023, 2:00 p.m. AEST This article has been updated with a statement from DoorDash.

Topics Apps & Software

0.5128s , 14208.1796875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【indian cute quick sex videos】DoorDash accused of charging iPhone users more than Android users in lawsuit,Global Hot Topic Analysis  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 粉嫩av无码一区二区三区软件 | h网站在线免费观看 | 波多野结衣av无码 | 午夜性刺激片免费观看 | 大香伊蕉在人线国产手机看片 | 波多野结衣第二页视频 | 99久久免费只有精品国产免费视频 | 91无码人妻精品一区二区蜜桃 | 国产91精品青草社区视频 | 午夜福利免费在线观看 | www.婷婷.com| 91亚洲国产亚洲国产 | 午夜福利精品久久 | 99久久人人爽亚洲精品美女 | 国产91精品久久 | 97免费人妻在线观看 | 99久无码中文字幕一本久道 | 91久久亚洲最新一本 | 91蜜桃麻豆| 午夜福利视频在线观看 | 午夜无码一区二区三区在线观看 | 97亚洲熟妇自偷自拍另类图片 | 午夜精品久久久久久99热蜜桃 | 国产99精 | 二区精品在线观看 | 波多野结衣av一区二区全免费观看 | 99国产精品电影 | 高清精品一区二区三区一区 | 午夜男女天天看大片视频播放 | 操到爽 | 91国内自产精华天堂 | 丰满熟妇乱又伦精品 | 囯产无码 | g片在线| 91久久偷偷做嫩草影院免费看 | 韩国三级大乳在线观看 | 国产AV人人妻人人爽 | 91精品久久人妻无码 | 99精品欧美一区二区三区 | 日韩av无码伊人 | av网站不卡高清在 |