国产精品美女一区二区三区-国产精品美女自在线观看免费-国产精品秘麻豆果-国产精品秘麻豆免费版-国产精品秘麻豆免费版下载-国产精品秘入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【oru?lu porno izlemek orucu bozarm?】Wikipedia demotes Breitbart to fake news

Source：Global Hot Topic Analysis Editor：knowledge Time：2025-07-02 06:05:42

Wikipedia,oru?lu porno izlemek orucu bozarm? the internet's crowd-sourced encyclopedia, has declared "fake news" on far-right site Breitbart, deeming the outlet an unreliable source for facts.

SEE ALSO: Milo Yiannopoulos' Facebook rant shows that de-platforming actually works

The decision, flagged by Motherboard, was declared on September 25, 2018 after an ongoing discussion amongst site administrators that concluded, "[Breitbart] should not be used, ever, as a reference for facts, due to its unreliability.

Scrolling through the debate is enlightening, seeing the various reaction from site admins to the nature of Breitbart, with some comparing it to the Daily Mail, the UK paper that was similarly demoted as an unreliable source in 2017.

You May Also Like

Support. If anything, it's even more unreliable than the Daily Mail, as they at least use trained journalists, whereas Breitbart is a fringe propaganda organization which lets its extreme partisan bias get in the way of howit reports things, and whetherit does so, just as Fox News does. It too should be deprecated, but let's start with Breitbart (and InfoWars). -- BullRangifer(talk) PingMe17:51, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

And:

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Support. I don't like the use of blanket bans, but Breitbart seems to satisfy the conditions that required the Daily Mail one - an obviously unreliable source, with a reputation for inaccurate stories, which a few users nonetheless insist on trying to use as if it were a reliable news source.

Some opposed the comparison, too, claiming the issue with the Daily Mail was about fabricated stories rather than unreliability and partisanship:

"I will support a ban for any news outlet if it is proven it is currently fabricating stories on a regular basis, but no evidence of fabrication has been presented in the proposal. The precedent established by The Daily Mailban simply does not apply in this case."

Breitbart isn't completely banned, though, as citations for the site will still be allowed in regards to opinion and commentary.

Motherboard also notes a similar August discussion surrounding Info Wars that was eventually closed citing the "Snowball clause," which states: "If an issue does not have a snowball's chance in hell of being accepted by a certain process, there's no need to run it through the entire process."

TL;DR, no one in their right mind would believe an Info Wars citation anyway so there's no need to ban it.

That President Trump has legitimized both sites did little to sway the Wikipedia decisions so it remains to be seen what this does for his own rallying cry of "fake news."

0.1473s , 8108.828125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【oru?lu porno izlemek orucu bozarm?】Wikipedia demotes Breitbart to fake news,Global Hot Topic Analysis  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板： 91尤物在线中文 | 成年女人免费视频 | 日韩av电影在线免费观看 | 丰满少妇a级毛片野外 | 97人妻免费上传视频 | www.五月天 | AV天堂午夜精品一区 | av无码国产永久播放蜜芽 | 暴爽AV天天爽日日碰 | ts人妖系列在线专区 | 午夜福利一区二区三区不卡 | av无码免费网站 | 99久久精品视香蕉蕉 | 91制片厂制作果冻传媒麻豆 | 成电影人免费网站 | 高清国产一级婬片a片免费 高清国产一区 | 91久久久久无码精品露脸 | bt天堂在线www中文 | 日韩av电影| 楚乔传第二部免费观看全集 | 午夜亚洲WWW湿好爽 午夜亚洲成av毛片 午夜亚洲电影一区二区三区 | 99视频只有精品 | 午夜福利电影网站鲁片大全 | 东京一本熟到无码视频 | 99精品久久精品一 | 午夜久久精品福利 | 99久亚洲精品视频 | 国产aⅴ一区二区 | 一区二区三区91 | 91精品无码国产在线观看一区 | www.久艹| 99国产精品久久人妻无码 | av天堂永| 91久久精品国产性色tv | b站在线永久免费观看 | 91精品国产高清91久 | 午夜视频在线免费播放 | 97久久偷偷做嫩草影院免费看 | 国产99在线播放 | 99久久精品亚洲国产 | www网站在线观看 |