What sells at the box office?как сжечь образы порнографии Historically, the answer for film studios, distributors, and their executives has been a white male lead. This bias hasn't changed, according to a new study undertaken by the University of Southern California. And more importantly, it may be wrong entirely.
The study from USC Annenberg's Inclusion Initiative, which was founded by communications professor Dr. Stacy L. Smith, found that identity of protagonists has little to do with determining success at the box office. The report looked at a sample of 126 top-grossing, live-action films from 2021 and 2022, examining factors that led to their box office success. The selection included only live action movies with solo leads — no re-releases or storylines with co-leads or ensemble casts.
SEE ALSO: ‘Barbie’ tops $1 billion, a new box office milestone for female directorsThe most significant finding is that films featuring male or white protagonists did not perform better theatrically than films led by female characters or underrepresented groups. That is, there is "no significant benefit" to having a male white lead in a starring role.
There's an even more systemic problem here. Theatrical support for films with such leads remains significantly higher than for movies with other leads. Women are consistently provided with fewer resources for production. Films with white male leads or underrepresented male leads have higher promotional budgets than those with white or underrepresented female leads.
"Movies about white male characters are still released most often by studios and distributors," Smith explained in a statement.
"The system was built to favor storytelling about one group: white males," Smith continued. "It is the way that executives support movies about white men that drives their success, not the protagonist themselves."
Other findings in the study reveal similar bias. Over half of the movies with the highest budgets (of $100 million or more) in the two-year period starred white males. Meanwhile, 15.8 percent featured a white female lead, and only 10.5 percent had an underrepresented female lead.
In reality, the study concludes, factors for box office success lie in the support structure for the film: namely production budget, marketing costs, and its widest point of release. These factors are simply more often applied to movies starring men.
Topics Film Social Good
Apple hires contractors to listen to some Siri recordings: Report'IT Chapter Two' offers up tickets for clownWhy lactose intolerant people DGAF about avoiding cheeseHow to ditch Google Chrome for FirefoxWhat that 'Euphoria' Season 1 finale means for Season 2: RecapYou'll have to wait even longer to borrow some new eDomain registry moves to ban cryptocurrency names100 million Americans' data accessed in massive Capitol One hackWhy you should and shouldn't consider getting a 5G hotspotWhat Intel's 10th Screenings of ‘Nausica? of the Valley of the Wind,’ ‘Castle in the Sky’ Immutable And MetaStudio Announce Partnership Strawberry Festival Chair to Speak at Ventura County JACL Installation BKEX Joins ‘Shark Tank of Web3’ Killer Whales After a Trying Year, Monterey Park Celebrates Again JANM Mourns Passing of Amy Uyematsu SFV JACL Installation Luncheon on Jan. 21 Imagine Little Tokyo Writing Workshop at Japanese American National Museum on Jan. 13 Belgrade Will Host the Brightest Web3 Minds This June ‘Hydra Medusa’: Poetry and Dreams from Brandon Shimoda
0.24s , 9828.390625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【как сжечь образы порнографии】White male leads don't equal box office success. But executives and studios are still biased.,Global Hot Topic Analysis