We all knew facial-recognition technology was flawed,порнография как искусство just perhaps not this flawed.
A new study from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, published on Dec. 19, lays out in painstaking detail how facial-recognition tech misidentifies the elderly, young, women, and people of color at rates higher than that of white men. In other words, more at risk populations are also the ones more likely to suffer false matches and any associated legal troubles that follow.
Just how bad is it? Let's let the NIST study authors explain.
"We found false positives to be higher in women than men, and this is consistent across algorithms and datasets," they wrote. "We found elevated false positives in the elderly and in children; the effects were larger in the oldest and youngest, and smallest in middle-aged adults."
And that's not all. "With mugshot images," the authors continued, "the highest false positives are in American Indians, with elevated rates in African American and Asian populations."
Why does this matter? Well, law enforcement uses the technology, and as such false positives can lead directly to mistaken arrests and harassment.
This study, which claims "empirical evidence" for its findings, is sure to add support to lawmakers' calls to ban the controversial tech.
"We have started to sound the alarm on the way facial recognition technology is expanding in concerning [ways]," wrote congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in July. "From the FBI to ICE to Amazon, the bar for consent and civil liberties protection is repeatedly violated, and on top of it all has a disproportionate racial impact, too."
She now has additional evidence to back up that latter claim.
SEE ALSO: Here's why San Francisco's vote to ban facial-recognition tech mattersImportantly, the congresswoman isn't alone in her concern. In a statement published by the Washington Post, Senator Ron Wyden reacted to the NIST findings by stating that "algorithms often carry all the biases and failures of human employees, but with even less judgment."
A growing number of cities, including San Francisco and Berkeley, recently moved to ban some government use of the tech. Perhaps this study will encourage others to follow suit.
Topics Facial Recognition
The Geek Squad scam is back in 2025: How to stay safeBig questions about raging Western U.S. wildfires, answeredToday's Hurdle hints and answers for May 9, 2025Apple is working on a chip for smart glasses, report claimsVolkswagen China names new technology chief to step up EV, software rollout · TechNodeTesla exports materials from China for 4680 battery production in Texas: report · TechNodeBest coffee machine deal: Save 25% on Philips Series 3300 espresso machineThe Geek Squad scam is back in 2025: How to stay safeBig questions about raging Western U.S. wildfires, answeredFamed NYC clock is counting down to Earth's climate change 'deadline' Korean Comfort Women Peace Monument Vandalized Talk on ‘Memory Loss and Alzheimer’s’ at Nibei Foundation L.A. Nishi Hongwanji Buddhist Temple to Observe 50th Anniversary at First St./Vignes Ave. ‘Feeling the Bern’ in J Heart Mountain Pilgrimage Features Tom Brokaw, Judge Ito The Game’s Best Friend: Dean Matsubayashi, from Basketball Star to Dedicated Community Leader Talk on ‘A Divided Korea’ at GLA JACL Meeting ‘Shadows for Peace: The Hiroshima Takei Leads Cross Nisei Week Announces Inspiration Award, President's Award Recipients
0.1402s , 7999.6640625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【порнография как искусство】Enter to watch online.Federal study confirms facial recognition is a biased mess,Global Hot Topic Analysis