国产精品美女一区二区三区-国产精品美女自在线观看免费-国产精品秘麻豆果-国产精品秘麻豆免费版-国产精品秘麻豆免费版下载-国产精品秘入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【a short treatise on eroticism kott】Did the White House delete a key question from Trump's press conference with Putin?

Source：Global Hot Topic Analysis Editor：hotspot Time：2025-07-03 02:17:08

It's been more than a week since Donald Trump and a short treatise on eroticism kottVladimir Putin held a joint press conference in Helsinki, Finland, but new areas of concern keep on springing up.

On Tuesday night, for instance, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow called attention to the fact that it appears the official White House video of the event omits one key question from Reuters reporter Jeff Mason, to which Putin gave a controversial response.

SEE ALSO: 5 most ridiculous moments from that disturbing Trump-Putin press conference

During the press conference, Mason asked Putin, "Did you want President Trump to win the election and did you direct any of your officials to help him do that?"

And Putin replied: "Yes, I did. Yes, I did. Because he talked about bringing the U.S.-Russia relationship back to normal."

But the first part of Mason's question — the part about wanting Trump to win — is not included in the White House's footage of the event.

In the White House video, Mason is simply heard asking, "And did you direct any of your officials to help him do that," followed by Putin's response.

The Atlanticreported the significant omission last week, adding that the official White House transcript of the exchange didn't include Mason's full question either.

Original image replaced with Mashable logoOriginal image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

Though it remains unclear if the omission was done intentionally or was simply an oversight, Maddow thinks the people at the White House know exactly what they've done.

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

"The U.S. government is essentially following the Kremlin’s playbook and maintaining that something we all saw happen with our own eyes, we all heard happen with our own ears, has nevertheless disappeared ― like old political opponents being airbrushed out of photos," Maddow said. "It’s weird, right? It’s creepy."

And Mason, the reporter who asked the question, also feels the omission could be extremely misleading.

"You could interpret that to mean he’s answering ‘yes’ to both," Mason told The Atlantic, but "looking at it critically, he spent a good chunk of that press conference, just like President Trump did, denying any collusion. So I think it’s likely that when he said ‘Yes, I did,’ that he was just responding to the first part of my question and perhaps didn’t hear the second part."

If that's the case, it's easy to assume the White House omitted the first part of the question so as not to make it seem like Putin wantedTrump to win, which would be further motive for election interference.

And in case things weren't confusing enough, the transcript on the Russian president's website omitted the exchange in question in its entirely.

The Washington Post,however, notes that even its own transcript of the event omits part of the question, so the act might not have been intentional.

"Ours came from Bloomberg Government and ours, too, excludes the first part of the reporters question in which he begins, 'President Putin, did you want President Trump to win the election,'" The Washington Post's Philip Bump writes.

The publication also reviewed video feeds from the conference and noticed a clear switch between the audio feed from reporters to translators.

A White House official also told CNN’s Abby Phillip that its transcript "did not have Mason's audio turned up in time," which explains the mishap.

Despite Maddow's impassioned argument, it sounds like technical difficulties might be to blame for this unfortunate omission.

Featured Video For You
Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No. It's an inflatable Trump baby flying around London

0.1803s , 10025.078125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【a short treatise on eroticism kott】Did the White House delete a key question from Trump's press conference with Putin?,Global Hot Topic Analysis  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板： 99久久精品无码一区二区毛 | 91桃色app| 国产av永久无码精品网站 | 午夜在线免费观看视频 | 97视频在线观看免费播放 | 午夜福利免费院 | 91网国| 国产AV巨作原创无码 | 午夜福利电影在线看 | 成人羞羞在线观看网站 | 91理论片午午伦夜理片久久 | 91精品国产乱码在 | 91色窝窝国产蝌蚪在线观看 | 午夜影院顶级大片 | 国产av一区二区三区久久浪潮 | 丰满少妇被猛男猛烈进入久久 | 97久久超碰国产精品 | 91亚洲综合最大 | 91午夜福利影院一区二区三 | 91高清无码大片 | a片试看120分 | 国产av在线观看18 | av天堂精品久久久久 | 91精品国产午夜 | 福利乱码卡一卡二卡新区 | 高清无码在线苍井空 | 91亚洲一区二区在线观看不卡 | 国产不卡网| 波多野结衣久 | 91精品国产福利在线观看 | 波多野结衣家庭教师秒播 | av网址入口在线观看 | 91精品国产一区在线观看 | 91精品无码久久久久久久久 | 91精品无人区麻豆乱码4区开放 | av天堂最新手机网址 | 国产www免费精品美女国产互换 | 高清视频在线观看www | 91免费福利视频 | 91中文字幕 | 国产a∨天天免费观看美女 国产a∨天天免费观看美女w |