国产精品美女一区二区三区-国产精品美女自在线观看免费-国产精品秘麻豆果-国产精品秘麻豆免费版-国产精品秘麻豆免费版下载-国产精品秘入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【phim b? sex】Enter to watch online.Wikipedia demotes Breitbart to fake news

Source: Editor:knowledge Time:2025-07-05 08:05:10

Wikipedia,phim b? sex the internet's crowd-sourced encyclopedia, has declared "fake news" on far-right site Breitbart, deeming the outlet an unreliable source for facts.

SEE ALSO: Milo Yiannopoulos' Facebook rant shows that de-platforming actually works

The decision, flagged by Motherboard, was declared on September 25, 2018 after an ongoing discussion amongst site administrators that concluded, "[Breitbart] should not be used, ever, as a reference for facts, due to its unreliability.

Scrolling through the debate is enlightening, seeing the various reaction from site admins to the nature of Breitbart, with some comparing it to the Daily Mail, the UK paper that was similarly demoted as an unreliable source in 2017.


You May Also Like

Support. If anything, it's even more unreliable than the Daily Mail, as they at least use trained journalists, whereas Breitbart is a fringe propaganda organization which lets its extreme partisan bias get in the way of howit reports things, and whetherit does so, just as Fox News does. It too should be deprecated, but let's start with Breitbart (and InfoWars). -- BullRangifer(talk) PingMe17:51, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

And:

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Support. I don't like the use of blanket bans, but Breitbart seems to satisfy the conditions that required the Daily Mail one - an obviously unreliable source, with a reputation for inaccurate stories, which a few users nonetheless insist on trying to use as if it were a reliable news source.

Some opposed the comparison, too, claiming the issue with the Daily Mail was about fabricated stories rather than unreliability and partisanship:

"I will support a ban for any news outlet if it is proven it is currently fabricating stories on a regular basis, but no evidence of fabrication has been presented in the proposal. The precedent established by The Daily Mailban simply does not apply in this case."

Breitbart isn't completely banned, though, as citations for the site will still be allowed in regards to opinion and commentary.

Motherboard also notes a similar August discussion surrounding Info Wars that was eventually closed citing the "Snowball clause," which states: "If an issue does not have a snowball's chance in hell of being accepted by a certain process, there's no need to run it through the entire process."

TL;DR, no one in their right mind would believe an Info Wars citation anyway so there's no need to ban it.

That President Trump has legitimized both sites did little to sway the Wikipedia decisions so it remains to be seen what this does for his own rallying cry of "fake news."

0.1595s , 8268.5546875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【phim b? sex】Enter to watch online.Wikipedia demotes Breitbart to fake news,  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 成年在线观看免费视频 | 91精品人妻aⅴ区 | 99re在线精品99re8热视频 | 午夜性色福利视频免费网站 | 91久久极品黑色自慰喷出白 | 91精品国产乱码在线观看入 | 成人午夜大片 | av在线理论片在 | 91香蕉视频观看精品在线 | 高清无码一区二区 | 99国模沟沟茂密的黑森林 | 国产91电影 | 99re在线视频一区 | 成人影片在线播放 | 91麻豆精品无码人妻系列 | 91精品人妻aⅴ区 | 91精品成 | 国产91蝌蚪 | 国产aⅴ无码片毛片一级网站 | 福利视频网站一区二区三区 | GAY空少被体育生开菊 | av性爱专区久 | 91精品国产高清久久久久久伦理片电影免费在线 | 午夜天堂精品久久久久 | 91高清免费国产自产拍2025 | av网一区二区三区 | 午夜麻豆国产精品无码久久 | 高潮娇喘抽搐喷水潮喷视频网站 | 91精品手机国产在线破解版 | 国产白丝精品爽爽久久久久久蜜臀 | h网址在线观看 | 91看片网址入口 | av不卡一区二区三区 | 午夜福利专区 | 91精品国产综合久久久 | 69无人区码一码二码三码区别 | hd无码入口18综合二区暖暖 | av在线播放你懂的 | 日韩av一区一区 | 国产aa夜夜欢一级黄色片 | 动漫成年美女黄漫视频免费播放 |