国产精品美女一区二区三区-国产精品美女自在线观看免费-国产精品秘麻豆果-国产精品秘麻豆免费版-国产精品秘麻豆免费版下载-国产精品秘入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【coi phim khiêu dam có t?i kh?ng】Facebook employees discuss 'f*cking with' developers in leaked internal chats

Source:Global Hot Topic Analysis Editor:explore Time:2025-07-03 02:53:47

Facebook's relationship with third-party developers has always had its ups and coi phim khiêu dam có t?i kh?ngdowns.

Thousands of pages of newly released internal Facebook documents — obtained by investigative reporter Duncan Campbell and published by NBC News — put a much finer point on it. The included chat logs paint a picture of a company that knew it was screwing over developers, a stance that caused at least some employees to lament how badly Facebook was "fucking with" the companies that relied on access to Facebook APIs and user data.

The documents originated from a lawsuit brought against Facebook by the startup Six4Three regarding the former's treatment of third-party apps. While under seal by California courts, UK courts compelled Six4Three's founder to hand over a laptop containing all the records. They were later leaked to the press.


You May Also Like

Previous reporting on these documents has shown that while Facebook positioned cutting off some third-parties' access to user data as being driven by privacy concerns, they were often actually about undercutting rivals.

The documents leaked on Wednesday make clear what at least some Facebook employees thought of this.

One such example came in October of 2013. Facebook's then head of developer products, Ilya Sukhar, was engaged in a spirited written debate with Facebook's then and current director of product management Edward O'Neil about "platform simplification" and the effort "to balance '[protecting] the graph' with helping developers."

And just what, exactly, does this mean? While it's difficult to read through all the corporate speak, a 2014 slide defines the "Protect the Graph" goal as, in part, the effort to "Limit data available to apps [remove friend APls, privatize high-value APls]."

Essentially, this is how Facebook internally described its effort to restrict what user data third-party apps were able to access. Which, it merits saying, is often a good thing.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Remember Cambridge Analytica?

Sukhar had some thoughts about all of this.

"I feel like Iam the only one with a principled stand here and you guys just want to get something done," wrote Sukhar. "I just spent the day talking to many dozens of devs that will get totally fucked by this and it won't even be for the right reason."

He wasn't the only one who thought so. Later in the same conversation, Douglas Purdy, who at the time was Facebook's director of product, told O'Neil that Sukhar's assessment was correct.

"[If] we don't support that, i agree with ilya that we are going to fucking with a lot of developers," wrote Purdy.

In an August conversation of the same year, Sukhar — who founded Parse, which was acquired by Facebook — explained to Parse cofounder Kevin Lacker an upcoming change to developers' access to Facebook data.

"They are making it so that apps can't see any of your friends that aren't also on the app," explained Sukhar. "Everyone's invitation flow is dead man walking."

Lacker knew what that meant. "Yeah it sounds fucked and like developers will hate us," he replied.

We reached out to Facebook for comment, but received no immediate response. Notably, Facebook insisted in a statement to Business Insider that "old documents have been taken out of context by someone with an agenda against Facebook."

SEE ALSO: Twitter's new ad policy prompts politicians to call out Facebook

This, of course, doesn't change what Facebook's own employees thought and put into writing.

Importantly, it bears repeating, reducing third-party developer access to Facebook users' data is good. These leaked internal messages, however, show just how much power Facebook had over those developers even way back in 2013 — and that the company wasn't afraid to fuck with them in its quest to dominate the internet.

Topics Cybersecurity Facebook Privacy Social Media

0.2928s , 8180.046875 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【coi phim khiêu dam có t?i kh?ng】Facebook employees discuss 'f*cking with' developers in leaked internal chats,Global Hot Topic Analysis  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 丁香月婷婷 | 91精品国产自产在 | 高潮影院 | 午夜热搜电影推荐免费观看全集在线 | 国产9色在线 | 午夜福利一区二区三区不卡 | 午夜小电影成人福利片 | 午夜福利1000集在线观看 | 99视频在线免费看 | 91久久人| 国产av你懂的 | 一区二区免费视频 | AV国产精品毛片一区二区小说 | ⅴ天堂中文在线 | 日韩av爽爽影院在线观看 | 91香蕉成人免费网站 | 99久久精品视香蕉蕉 | 91在线无码精品 | 97久久久久久久久精品 | 午夜福利看757 | 91香蕉国产线观看免费茄子 | 日韩av成人无码久久 | av麻豆日本在线观看母与子 | 午夜www在线观看完整版视频 | 丁香花五月婷婷开心 | 一区二区三区视频免费 | 一区二区三区日韩无 | 91蜜桃长长久久 | 成人黄色免费观看 | 国产爆乳无码一区二区麻豆 | av无码专区亚洲avl在线 | 国产91精品秘入口蝌蚪 | 韩国三级精品 | 午夜无码国产精品有码无码av在线播放亚洲精品国产va在 | 99久久99| 91精品91久久久中77777 | 91精品在线免费观看 | 东京热无码一区二区三区av | av无一区二区三区 | av尤物在线观看 | 波多野结衣av高清中文 |