国产精品美女一区二区三区-国产精品美女自在线观看免费-国产精品秘麻豆果-国产精品秘麻豆免费版-国产精品秘麻豆免费版下载-国产精品秘入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【mexican amatuer sex video beautiful】Your political views help determine which science books you buy

Source:Global Hot Topic Analysis Editor:explore Time:2025-07-02 23:09:47

Our political leanings can mexican amatuer sex video beautifulinfluence plenty of our day-to-day choices, from the news we read and watch, to the Facebook friends we hide and the Tweets we like. It's no secret that people tend to gravitate toward ideas that reaffirm their worldview.

This filtering doesn't exclusively exist online. Even the paper-and-ink books we buy can reflect our political preferences -- particularly when it comes to books on science.

A new study found that people who buy conservative or liberal political books in the U.S. are equally interested in science books, but they pick works on starkly different topics.

SEE ALSO: Here’s how you create echo chambers on Facebook

Buyers of liberal books tend to prefer books on basic sciences, such as physics and astronomy, while buyers of conservative books prefer applied sciences, such as criminology and geophysics, researchers found in a paper published Monday in Nature Human Behaviour.

Conservative book buyers were also more inclined to buy "peripheral" science books, meaning books that aren't considered mainstream science reading and express more of a political bent.

Credit: Darren McCollester/Getty Images Credit: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Take, for instance, Rich Trzupek's How the EPA's Green Tyranny is Stifling America, or Steve Milloy's Green Hell. Peripheral liberal books included Bob Dean's Reckless: The Political Assault on the American Environment and Van Jones' The Green Collar Economy.

To the study's authors, this political split might be the analogue equivalent of a Facebook "echo chamber" that silences opposing views, or an "information bubble" that isolates news consumers from politically inconvenient truths.

"Even if there's a big pool of common ideas, people aren't consuming them evenly," said James Evans, co-author of the study and director of the University of Chicago's Knowledge Lab.

"The likelihood that political liberals and conservatives who are coming to the table to discuss a major problem in society are going to have exposure to the same kind of research, the same facts, is very limited," he said.

Via Giphy

Kelly Garrett, an associate professor at Ohio State University's School of Communications who was not involved with the research, said he disagreed with framing the results as further proof of information bias. Showing that liberals prefer books on basic sciences, or that conservatives tend to pick applied science books, doesn't necessarily mean consumers are willfully ignoring diverse viewpoints, he said.

"It's a really interesting study, but I don't like framing this as an echo chamber or a filter bubble. That's premature," Garrett said.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Books, books, books

Evans and his colleagues didn't survey actual book buyers. Instead, they studied U.S. purchasing behavior from the world's two biggest online bookstores: Amazon and Barnes & Noble. Neither company released internal sales data, so the researchers analyzed the algorithms that create up to 100 suggestions under the "Customers who bought this item also bought..." section.

The team collected nearly 26.5 million "co-purchase" links among 1.3 million books from Amazon.com. Then they divvied the books into three groups: political, science and non-science.

Mashable ImageCredit: david ramos/Getty Images

Among the 3,500 politically relevant titles, they identified 673 conservative books and 583 liberal books; some 2,300 "indeterminate" books were discarded. Researchers collected similar information from Barnes & Noble's co-purchasing network and found the same patterns.

A book was considered "science" if it was listed under science categories in the Library of Congress and Dewey Decimal classifications. Nearly 429,000 science titles were grouped into over two dozen high-level topics, which were then distilled into four main schools: humanities, physical sciences, life sciences, and social sciences.

Based on the data, they found conservative books were more likely to be co-purchased with books in applied sciences, such as medicine, law, and -- wait for it -- climatology. Yes, people associated with a political party whose leadership denies mainstream climate science are buying quite a few books on the topic.

Via Giphy

For Garrett, this finding undermines the idea of an echo chamber. "An echo chamber suggests that someone who doubts climate science should be trying to stay well clear" of the field, he said.

Liberal books were more likely to be co-purchased with books in basic science disciplines, such as zoology, anthropology and philosophy.

Some science topics were deemed "purple" if they were co-purchased by both the left and right. Perhaps paleontology and veterinary medicine can bridge this nation's political divides?

For Evans, the algorithms that connect buyers of political books to certain types of science books may be the bookstore equivalent of the Facebook News Feed: A digital microphone that amplifies the things you agree with while moving diverse or opposing views to the bottom of the pile.

Original image replaced with Mashable logoOriginal image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable Original image replaced with Mashable logoOriginal image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

"In the same way your friends online influence the news you read, these recommender engines send books that are like other parts of you," he said.

"And so you end up getting potential feedbacks that are concerning."

Yet despite rising worries that Americans are growing more narrow-minded, other research suggests we might not be living inside our own thought bubbles after all.

Separate studies using Nielsen TV viewership data, the web activity of more than 10,000 Americans over a year, plus the news choices of 10 million Facebook users all indicate we're not shutting ourselves off to disagreeable information. Another paper found the audiences for CNN and Fox News programs aren't completely separate, either.

Still, this study makes one thing clear: Science can't escape politics.


Featured Video For You
10,000 books create a literary river

0.1855s , 14141.8515625 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【mexican amatuer sex video beautiful】Your political views help determine which science books you buy,Global Hot Topic Analysis  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 东京热亚洲精品无码 | 一区二区三区精品免费视频 | 97在线视频人妻无码男人三区免费在线播放天堂 | 高潮喷水在线 | 高清无码国内自拍视频 | 99久久国产自偷自偷免费一区 | 国产91免费 | 午夜福利1692免费视颍 | 一区一区三区产品乱码 | 成熟丰满 | 91网站永久免费看nba视频 | av無碼精品一區二區三區四區 | 91免费版视频在线观看 | 99国产亚洲精品美女久久久久 | 国产a天天免费观看美女 | 91福利国产在线播放午夜 | 18丝瓜视频 | 1区2区3区4区产品在线线乱码 | av在线国产日韩一区 | 高潮流白浆在线观看 | 91麻豆精品国产91久久久点播时 | 午夜高清精品一区二区三区 | 国产av永久无码天 | 97色在线精品视频 | A片高潮抽搐揉捏奶头视频 A片高潮抽搐揉捏奶头视频在线看 | 午夜大片无码体验区sh国产 | 91久久亚洲精品国产 | 国产91青青成人a在线 | 1区1区3区4区不卡乱码在 | 91热视频在线观看 | 99久久精品无码一区二区毛色欲 | 午夜毛片在线免费 | 高清无码国产精 | 丁香婷婷色综合 | 午夜wwww | 99久久就热视频精品草 | 97超碰A片人人爽人人澡97 | 午夜动态视频 | av人妻精品 | 成人黄色在线视频 | 午夜丰满99久久伊人精品综 |