国产精品美女一区二区三区-国产精品美女自在线观看免费-国产精品秘麻豆果-国产精品秘麻豆免费版-国产精品秘麻豆免费版下载-国产精品秘入口

Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

【sex video mia khalifa】NFT owners insist they're totally not owned by 'right

Source:Global Hot Topic Analysis Editor:explore Time:2025-07-03 02:07:18

It's cool. No,sex video mia khalifa seriously, it's totally cool.

As non-fungible tokens (NFTs) continue to sell for tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars in cryptocurrency, those passionate about the digital tokens would very much like critics to know one thing: the scores of trolls copy-pasting their pricey JPEGs are only helping their cause. Or, so the extremely annoyed NFT owners insist.

It's a scene that plays out daily across Twitter, as the members of breakout NFT communities like CryptoPunks and the Bored Ape Yacht Club share their latest scores — along with the mind-boggling prices paid — only to immediately be ridiculed by right-click savers swarming their mentions.

The term, as you might expect, refers to the ability of anyone to right-click and save a public image associated with an NFT. For the unfamiliar, when it comes to artwork, an NFT is often not the art itself, but rather, as one expert put it, like "directions to the museum" where the art is being held.

Here's how the latest crypto culture battle typically plays out: As soon as someone announces a particularly pricey NFT purchase, the right-click savers pounce — tweeting the copied CryptoPunk or Ape back at its proud owner.

After one NFT enthusiast, RookieXBT, claimed to have purchased CryptoPunk 3794 for $157,069 (a sale price confirmed by CryptoPunks' creator Larva Labs), the right-click savers wasted no time in doing their thing.

"Cool, I got mine for free," replied one along with an image of the CryptoPunk in question.

"What do you think of my punk," asked another.

"I just screen shotted this," replied yet another.

Some even screenshot the act of right-click saving to add perceived insult to injury.

"stop stealing other peoples property," came the plaintive reply.

This wasn't even the first time RookieXBT has been right-click saved.

"bro this is so dumb, people are stealing my punk that i paid $225k for and using it as their profile picture," wrote the CryptoPunk owner on July 31. "how is this legal"

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Predictably, the CryptoPunk in question was immediately right-click saved and tweeted back at RookieXBT.

We reached out to confirm that RookieXBT does in fact own the CryptoPunks in question, but received no immediate response. However, as of the time of this writing, the same account owns several CryptoPunks, which RookieXBT has tweeted about purchasing.

Arguments about copy-pasted NFTs pop up all over Twitter. In one such instance, a self-described "NFT Investor" takes another Twitter account to task for supposedly right-click saving their Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFT and using it as an avatar.

"I am asking you to change your profile picture as I own the IP and paid 50 Eth for it," reads the request from CapetainTrippy. 50 Eth, incidentally, is about $150,000. "I understand you may be new and would love to have you in #bayc but you need to use a different ape."

Mashable ImageOwning that IP, or something. Credit: screenshot / twitter

"literally right click save as lol," came an immediate reply.

While RookieXBT and CapetainTrippy may be openly stressed about getting right-click saved, other NFT fans want the world to know that the right-click savers are actually owning themselves.

"When you save the image and use it / share it you are making the underlying token more valuable," wrote one. "Kinda ironic how the right click save crowd is actually doing free marketing for nft holders"

This line of thinking, that right-click saving represents a fundamental misunderstanding of NFTs and is itself to be mocked, is pervasive among the diehard NFT crew.

"saying u stole my nft bc u right click saved it is the same as saying u stole my eth balance bc u right clicked saved the number," argued one.

"NO YOU CAN'T SELL AN NFT FOR $69.34M I CAN JUST RIGHT CLICK AND DOWNLOAD IT WHYYYYYYYYYYY," joked the former lead maintainer of the cryptocurrency Monero, and Yat cofounder, Riccardo Spagni.

"Ngl, I kinda enjoy getting right-click-saved," read one NFT fan playing it cool.

So who's right? The NFT owners spending, and sometimes making, untold riches as they buy and sell digital tokens referencing supposedly rare JPEGs? Or the scores of critics sitting on the sidelines, right-click saving while shaking their heads at people who they believe clearly have too much money?

In some ways, both groups are.

NFTs are separate from whatever art they represent. Most often, they're an Ethereum token consisting of metadata describing the artwork in question. Although, there are some cases where the NFT also actually contains the art. As of Aug. 18, CryptoPunks just so happens to be an example of the latter. Larva Labs announced that, as of Wednesday, the 24-by-24 pixel CryptoPunk artwork is now stored on the blockchain.

It's true that owning an NFT does grant the ability to do things that right-click saving an image doesn't (questions of copyright transfer remain complex). But as those things involve cryptographically proving ownership of the NFT along with the ability to sell it, it's all a bit circular.

Either way, as the NFT crowd correctly argues, right-clicking saving a JPEG tied to an NFT doesn't mean you now own the associated NFT.

SEE ALSO: Say hello to Yats: Why investors are paying thousands to 'own' emoji

At the same time, however, the right-click save crowd has successfully highlighted what is perhaps the core reason NFTs have, at least as of yet, struggled to go mainstream: many people consider the idea behind NFTs to be a big dumb joke.

And if the internet loves anything more than owning those it views as dumb, it's debating who is, in fact, getting owned.

Topics Cryptocurrency

0.1672s , 10369.5859375 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【sex video mia khalifa】NFT owners insist they're totally not owned by 'right,Global Hot Topic Analysis  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 午夜影院国产理伦理片 | 伴郎粗大的内捧猛烈进出视频观看 | 国产1区2区3区在线观看 | 东京热无码一区 | av免费一级特黄美女图片 | 91精品啪在线观看国产91 | AV多人爱爱XXx | 97超级碰碰碰碰久久久久 | 一区二区三区不卡在线观看 | 99久久精品精品6精品精品 | 成年人网站 | 国产91精品一区二区麻豆亚洲 | 99久久久无码国产精品免费 | 97人妻免费视频中文 | 高清欧美日韩视频一区二区 | 91精品啪在线观 | 二区不卡| av免费网址国产精品 | 91蜜桃国产成人精品区在线观看 | 99视频在线免费观看 | av潮喷大喷水系列无码 | 91精品国产制服啪啪无码 | 91麻豆精品国产自产在线观看一 | 1024国产精品二区 | 91九色中文在线播放 | 91精品尤物在线观看 | 2025国产在线视频 | 午夜免费福利网站 | 午夜寂寞剧场 | 91大神精品网站 | 国产ts人妖系列视频网站 | 91人妻视频 | 爆乳无码专区www | 波多野结衣电影在线观看电影免费在线观看 | 国产aⅴ无码精品一区二区三区 | 国产aⅴ一区二区 | 91伊人色伊人亚 | a级免费网站 | 99久久婷婷国产综合 | 一区二区三区四区产品乱码芒果精品 | 果冻传媒一二三产品 |